NAD: 1986 JCM800 2204

For all discussions about electric, acoustic and bass guitars, guitar amps, effects, modelers this is the place!!!!!
User avatar
Guitarbilly
Site Admin
Posts: 1136
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2024 7:08 am

Re: NAD: 1986 JCM800 2204

Post by Guitarbilly »

Lukeburke1 wrote: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:07 pm
Guitarbilly wrote: Mon Apr 15, 2024 1:59 pm
Lukeburke1 wrote: Mon Apr 15, 2024 1:52 pm Also, don’t the horizontal-input 800s have the DI out on the back? You could run that directly to a second power amp instead of a load box. Would be one less piece of equipment to carry :idk:
True, I can take the signal straight from the DI out. But the amp still needs a load.
Ah, that’s fair. I was under the impression you would do wet/dry with the second power amp
I could, but that would mean 2 cabs. Or maybe I could do it with a stereo cab but I'm not sure how a w/d rig would sound into a single cab.

I have the load part of the equation figured out, I have a Hot Plate attenuator and a Suhr Reactive Load, both will work well.

I think the Bluguitar will work for the reamp part. I just tried it last night with decent results. Need to see how it will work at practice.

User avatar
Guitarbilly
Site Admin
Posts: 1136
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2024 7:08 am

Re: NAD: 1986 JCM800 2204

Post by Guitarbilly »

Vladimir Putin wrote: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:09 pm Just set a Carbon Copy up front with the mix way down. I love that aesthetic since I have the matching 86 cab :D
Yeah that definitely works although it's a different sound than post delay.

User avatar
greatmutah
Moderator
Posts: 544
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2024 11:15 am
Location: Downriver MI

Re: NAD: 1986 JCM800 2204

Post by greatmutah »

Guitarbilly wrote: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:00 pm
greatmutah wrote: Mon Apr 15, 2024 1:57 pm Not to further enable your buying habits (or maybe I am?), but wouldn’t that Palmer Supreme Soaker do the loop thing as well as the Palmer thing and knock out a few pieces of gear at once?
Yes that would work. It's $1100 though :(
Damn. Yeah not much of a difference between that and a Power Station cost wise.
More guitars than anyone could need
—————
Metropoulos Metroplex Mk I
Egnater Seminar Amp 50
Orange Rockerverb 50 Mk III
Peavey 5150
Fender 1976 Vibrolux Reverb
—————
Marshall 1960A G12M25 Greenbacks
Metropoulos Slant 2x12 G12H75 Creambacks.

heath
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2024 4:01 pm

Re: NAD: 1986 JCM800 2204

Post by heath »

Guitarbilly wrote: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:14 pm...Or maybe I could do it with a stereo cab but I'm not sure how a w/d rig would sound into a single cab...
I ran wet and dry into a single stereo cab for years. I found that rearranging the wiring so the speakers were not L/R but top left and bottom right, and top right and bottom left sounded more natural and seemed a little wider.

User avatar
cliffenstein
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2024 11:34 pm
Location: Berlin, MD, USA
Contact:

Re: NAD: 1986 JCM800 2204

Post by cliffenstein »

A+ score ... never played a bad JCM 800 2204 myself!
1988 MIJ Fender ST54 Hardtail Strat
2005 Edwards E-JR-100LT/DC
2012 Gibson LP Trad Mahog
2015 Fender RW '50s Strat
2023 Gibson LPJ
2024 Epiphone LPC
-------
2003 Marshall DSL50
2021 Epic AR50
2022 Mojotone British 800 2204
2022 Grand Mojotone JCW 2204

dstroud
Posts: 98
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2024 3:28 pm

Re: NAD: 1986 JCM800 2204

Post by dstroud »

congrats man cant go wrong there!!!

User avatar
Guitarbilly
Site Admin
Posts: 1136
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2024 7:08 am

Re: NAD: 1986 JCM800 2204

Post by Guitarbilly »

heath wrote: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:27 pm
Guitarbilly wrote: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:14 pm...Or maybe I could do it with a stereo cab but I'm not sure how a w/d rig would sound into a single cab...
I ran wet and dry into a single stereo cab for years. I found that rearranging the wiring so the speakers were not L/R but top left and bottom right, and top right and bottom left sounded more natural and seemed a little wider.
That's interesting. I may give that a shot.

User avatar
Guitarbilly
Site Admin
Posts: 1136
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2024 7:08 am

Re: NAD: 1986 JCM800 2204

Post by Guitarbilly »

Looking at the back of the amp now, there are 3 jacks, 2 for speakers and one for DI. I so I could install the Metro effects loop in the DI jack and one of the speaker jacks and leave only one jack for speaker out. That would allow me to install the loop without drilling the amp. I think that is what I am going to do since the loop is 85 bucks and I won't have to carry anything extra.

Lukeburke1
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2024 4:06 pm

Re: NAD: 1986 JCM800 2204

Post by Lukeburke1 »

Guitarbilly wrote: Mon Apr 15, 2024 3:00 pm Looking at the back of the amp now, there are 3 jacks, 2 for speakers and one for DI. I so I could install the Metro effects loop in the DI jack and one of the speaker jacks and leave only one jack for speaker out. That would allow me to install the loop without drilling the amp. I think that is what I am going to do since the loop is 85 bucks and I won't have to carry anything extra.

If you go the Metro Loop option without drilling, amp their option is to use a TRS jack in the DI spot for the loop and splitting it out with one of these:

https://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail ... tsf-6-inch

My first “big” amp was a Crate GT212 that had a loop like this. I asked a while back in the Metro Loop group on Facebook if it would work, and they said it should.

I’ve thought about doing this myself if I grab an 800. That way, I can use the second speaker output hole for a PPIMV
Last edited by Lukeburke1 on Mon Apr 15, 2024 3:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Gibson Les Paul Traditional Pro II
Gibson SG-3
Gibson Les Paul Special
Marshall JCM 800 2204—Emperor 2x12 (UK Vintage 30s)
Vox AC30HWH—Janice Cabs 2x12 (Greenbacks)

User avatar
Vladimir Putin
Posts: 450
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2024 5:51 pm
Location: Москва
Contact:

Re: NAD: 1986 JCM800 2204

Post by Vladimir Putin »

Guitarbilly wrote: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:15 pm
Vladimir Putin wrote: Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:09 pm Just set a Carbon Copy up front with the mix way down. I love that aesthetic since I have the matching 86 cab :D
Yeah that definitely works although it's a different sound than post delay.
True, but it's not like the amp will stick around that long anyway and your DSL already has a loop :lol: :o
Ukraine? Mykraine

Post Reply